Farm & Ranch
Avian Influenza Update
Barry Whitworth, DVM
Area Food/Animal Quality and Health
Specialist for Eastern Oklahoma
High Path Avian Influenza (HPAI) continues to be a problem in commercial and backyard poultry in the Unites States (US) with over 60 million birds affected. Since the start of the outbreak in 2022, 879 flocks (347 commercial and 532 backyard flocks) have been confirmed with HPAI in the US. Many wild birds and mammals have been affected as well. Five backyard flocks and one commercial flock have been confirmed with HPAI during this outbreak in Oklahoma. The latest was detected in a backyard flock in Carter County on October 16, 2023. For a complete listing of domestic birds, wild birds, and mammals affected by HPAI visit 2022-2023 Detection of High Path Avian Influenza website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-disease-information/avian/avian-influenza/2022-hpai.
Avian influenza (AI) is a highly contagious viral disease. The virus is classified as either Low Path Avian Influenza (LPAI) or HPAI depending on the virulence. This virus infects many food producing birds such as chickens and turkeys while it commonly resides in migratory waterfowl and many other wild birds. Most often ducks, geese, and wild birds harbor the virus in the intestinal tract without having any clinical signs of the disease. The virus is shed in the feces and respiratory secretions from infected birds. Poultry can be infected with the virus when they come in direct contact with infected birds or consume feed that is contaminated with the virus. The virus can be spread indirectly through objects like shoes, clothes, or equipment contaminated with the virus.
Clinical signs of the disease vary depending on the severity of the virus and the organ system affected. LPAI usually results in no clinical signs or only mild problems. However, HPAI has many different clinical signs. Death with no symptoms is a common finding. Respiratory problems such as coughing, sneezing, watery eyes, and nasal discharges may be seen. Depression resulting in loss of appetite and decrease consumption of water may occur. Egg production may be impacted with a decrease in production and/or softshell or misshapen eggs. A bird’s comb, wattle, head, eyelids, and hocks may swell. Combs and wattles may turn purple. Nervous system disorders including tremors, incoordination, and unusual positions of the head may be seen. Diarrhea has been reported in some cases. For more information about clinical signs visit Defend the Flock-Signs of Illness at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-disease-information/avian/defend-the-flock-program/outbreak-illness/outbreak-illness.
For commercial and backyard poultry flocks, the best defense against HPAI is a sound biosecurity program. Biosecurity is the development and implementation of management procedures intended to reduce or prevent unwanted threats from entering a flock. The protocol is designed to reduce or prevent the spread of unwanted threats through the flock and eliminate any unwanted pathogens that may enter the flock. Lastly, a biosecurity plan is designed to prevent threats from infecting neighboring poultry operations. Biosecurity can be broken down into four basic areas which include traffic, isolation, sanitation, and husbandry.
The first line of defense should be limiting the traffic that enters the area. Poultry operations should have a perimeter buffer area (PBA). For backyard poultry operations, this could be a fence. In commercial operations this may be a fence or road that surrounds the facility. All entry points need to be clearly marked with “Do Not Enter” signs. In a study by United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) evaluating factors associated with introduction of HPAI in layer farms in the US, the presence of a gate was found to be protective against the introduction of the virus. Gates with signage may encourage people to follow biosecurity protocols.
Inside the PBA, a line of separation (LOS) needs to be established. The LOS isolates the birds from possible sources of infections. The LOS is usually the walls of the poultry building plus the entry point. No person should cross this line without following proper biosecurity protocols. Producers should provide visitors with clean coveralls and disposable shoe covers. Visitors should wash their hands before and after visiting the facility. All visitors should dip their shoes in a disinfectant solution when entering and exiting the facility. Also, no other animals, wild or domestic should cross the LOS.
Sanitation is one of the most important parts of a biosecurity plan. All equipment, feeders, waterers, and buildings need to be cleaned and disinfected regularly. First, all fecal material and dirt should be physically removed. Next, disinfectants must be applied and allowed sufficient contact time to work properly. Foot baths need to be properly maintained. The property outside the poultry house should be kept mowed and cleaned. Failure to keep the grass cut and/or to promptly clean up feed spills is associated with HPAI.
Poultry producers must also practice good animal husbandry. Flocks need to be observed several times per day. Producers need to collect and dispose of dead birds frequently. Producer should know the clinical signs of a sick bird. Any unusual increases in sick or dead birds should be reported to proper authorities. Backyard producers have several options. They can contact their veterinarian or Oklahoma State University County Extension office. They can also contact the Oklahoma State Veterinarian at 405-522-6141.
The National Poultry Improvement Plan (NPIP) has guidelines for a biosecurity protocol. Commercial and backyard poultry producers should examine the NPIP 14 standards of the biosecurity protocol. Any areas that do not meet the standards need to be addressed. The NPIP biosecurity audit form can be found at http://www.poultryimprovement.org/documents/AuditForm-2018BiosecurityPrinciples.pdf. Additional sources for backyard poultry producers can be found at the USDA Defend the Flock website at healthybirds.aphis.usda.gov, Protect Your Poultry From Avian Influenza at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/publications/animal_health/bro-protect-poultry-from-ai.pdf or Oklahoma State University fact sheet Small Flock Biosecurity for Prevention of Avian Influenza ANSI-8301.
Avian Influenza is a major threat to the US and Oklahoma poultry industry. It is the responsibility of all commercial and backyard poultry producers to do everything in their power to protect this industry.
Reference
Swayne, D.E. and Halvorson, D.A. 2003 Influenza. In Y. M. Saif (ed.). Diseases of Poultry, 11th ed. Iowa State Press: Ames, Iowa, 135-160.
Green, A. L., Branan, M., Fields, V. L., Patyk, K., Kolar, S. K., Beam, A., Marshall, K., McGuigan, R., Vuolo, M., Freifeld, A., Torchetti, M. K., Lantz, K., & Delgado, A. H. (2023). Investigation of risk factors for introduction of highly pathogenic avian influenza H5N1 virus onto table egg farms in the United States,
2022: a case-control study. Frontiers in veterinary science, 10, 1229008.
Farm & Ranch
Theileria orientalis in Oklahoma
By Barry Whitworth, DVM
Over the past few years, Theileria orientalis has been detected in cattle in Oklahoma. Early cases were primarily diagnosed in adult cattle. However, more recent cases in Oklahoma have been identified in stocker cattle. All cattle producers should be familiar with the clinical signs of this disease and observe their cattle daily for any signs of trouble.
In the United States, the first case of theileriosis was identified in Virginia in August 2017. These cattle exhibited clinical signs of weakness and anemia. An initial diagnosis of anaplasmosis was made. Blood samples from the animals were tested for Anaplasma, Babesia, and Leptospira. Test results were negative for all three; however, a blood protozoan was detected. This organism was identified as T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Since this initial herd outbreak, the organism has been detected in several states.
Cattle infected with and showing illness from T. orientalis genotype Ikeda may exhibit clinical signs such as fever, weakness, anorexia, and exercise intolerance. If forced to move, affected cattle may stagger and gasp for air. If stressed excessively, they may collapse and die. Upon examination, the gums, eyes, or vaginal mucosa may appear pale (white) or yellow in color. Reproductive losses, including stillbirths and late-term abortions, may occur, along with a reduction in milk production.
Clinical signs reported in adult cattle in Oklahoma include anemia, sudden death, weight loss, abortion, failure to thrive, and failure to calve. In stocker cattle, weight loss, anemia, poor performance, and sudden death have been reported.
Because Anaplasma marginale and T. orientalis genotype Ikeda produce similar clinical signs, distinguishing between the two can be challenging.
One notable difference is that clinical signs are more commonly observed in young cattle infected with T. orientalis, whereas this is less common in cattle infected with A. marginale. Additionally, cattle with anaplasmosis often display aggression, whereas those with T. orientalis genotype Ikeda typically do not. A laboratory test is required to definitively differentiate between the two diseases.
Haemaphysalis longicornis has been identified as a possible vector of T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. In 2017, the United States Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) National Veterinary Services Laboratories (NSVL) confirmed the presence of H. longicornis, commonly referred to as the Asian longhorned tick (ALT) or bush tick. In efforts to determine how the tick arrived in the United States, USDA officials discovered it had been present in West Virginia as early as 2010. The tick has now been confirmed in at least 26 states, including Oklahoma. There is also some evidence suggesting additional insect vectors may transmit T. orientalis genotype Ikeda. Needle transfer is another possible route of transmission.
The ALT has been identified in Craig and Mayes counties in Oklahoma. This tick thrives in areas with high humidity, such as wooded regions, brush, or tall grass. Ticks are often found where large numbers of wildlife congregate, such as along deer trails. Producers seeking more information about the ALT can visit the USDA website at: https://www.aphis.usda. gov/livestock-poultry-disease/ cattle/ticks/asian-longhorned.
In other countries, treatments have been developed for T. orientalis. Unfortunately, no approved treatments are currently available in the United States, and no vaccines exist for this disease. The best defense is prevention: purchasing cattle free of the organism, avoiding blood transfer between animals, and implementing effective tick control measures. Producers should purchase cattle from reputable sources. Instruments should be cleaned between animals during procedures such as castration or dehorning, and needles should always be changed between animals. External parasites must be controlled using appropriate insecticide treatments. In addition to insecticides, pasture management strategies—such as rotation to avoid wooded or brushy areas where ticks thrive—are important. Patch burning may also help reduce tick populations.
Theileria orientalis remains a concern for some cow/calf and stocker producers in Oklahoma. Producers seeking more information about T. orientalis genotype Ikeda should contact their local veterinarian or Oklahoma State University County Extension Agriculture educator.
References Hammer, J. F., Emery, D., Bogema, D. R., & Jenkins, C. (2015). Detection of Theileria orientalis genotypes in Haemaphysalis longicornis Ticks from Southern Australia. Parasites & vectors, 8, 229.
Oakes, V. J., Yabsley, M. J., Schwartz, D., LeRoith, T., Bissett, C., Broaddus, C., Schlater, J. L., Todd, S. M., Boes, K. M., Brookhart, M., & Lahmers, K. K. (2019). Theileria orientalis Ikeda Genotype in Cattle, Virginia, USA. Emerging infectious diseases, 25(9), 1653–1659.
Spickler, Anna Rovid. (2019). Theileriosis. Retrieved from http://www.iastate.edu/DiseaseUbfi/factsheets.php.
Watts, J. G., Playford, M. C., Hickey, K.L. (2016). Theileria orientalis: A Review, New
Zealand Veterinary Journal, 64:1, 3-9.
Farm & Ranch
When an Old Threat Returns
By Ann Asher
Then there are the diseases and pests that younger generations have only read about.
For decades, New World screwworm belonged in that second category. Older ranchers remembered the days when a simple branding wound or a newborn calf’s navel had to be watched closely because it could attract one of the livestock industry’s most destructive pests. Veterinarians still taught students how to recognize it, but for many producers, screwworm was something that had been conquered long before they ever worked their first set of cattle.
This summer, that changed. On June 3, 2026, the U.S. Department of Agriculture confirmed New World screwworm in a calf in South Texas, marking the parasite’s return to the United States after decades of successful eradication. While Oklahoma has not reported any confirmed cases, the discovery has ranchers across the Southern Plains paying close attention. The concern isn’t just where screwworm is today, but where it could be tomorrow.
Unlike the common maggots that feed on dead tissue, New World screwworm larvae feed on living flesh. Adult female flies are drawn to fresh wounds and natural body openings, laying hundreds of eggs at a time. Within hours, the larvae hatch and begin burrowing into healthy tissue, enlarging the wound as they feed. Left untreated, an infestation can become life-threatening.
There are some livestock problems that today’s ranchers know by heart. Pinkeye. Foot rot. Horn flies. Internal parasites. Most producers have dealt with them at one time or another.
The list of potential hosts is long. Cattle, horses, sheep, goats, pigs, dogs, wildlife and, in rare cases, people can all become infested. Even relatively small injuries—a wire cut, a tick bite, a branding wound, a castration site, a dehorning wound or a newborn calf’s healing navel—can provide an opportunity for the fly.
Fortunately, today’s producers have one advantage their grandparents often did not: they know what they’re looking for.
A wound that continues to grow instead of heal should never be ignored. Bloody or watery discharge, a strong foul odor, swelling, pain, visible larvae and unusual behavior such as excessive licking, head shaking or isolation from the herd all warrant a closer look. While these signs can indicate several different conditions, they should also prompt producers to consider the possibility of screwworm and contact their veterinarian immediately.
The return of screwworm has also reminded many people of one of agriculture’s greatest success stories.
During the mid-1900s, New World screwworm cost American livestock producers millions of dollars each year. Rather than relying solely on insecticides, scientists developed what became known as the Sterile Insect Technique. Millions of sterile male flies were raised and released into affected areas. Female screwworm flies mate only once during their lifetime. When they mated with sterile males, no offspring were produced. As generation after generation failed to reproduce, screwworm populations steadily declined until the pest was eliminated from the United States and later pushed farther south through Mexico and much of Central America.
That same strategy is once again leading the response.
Federal and state animal health officials have increased surveillance in affected areas, established movement controls where necessary and resumed sterile fly releases to prevent the pest from becoming established. Veterinarians, livestock markets and producers are all part of the early detection system, with every suspicious case helping officials determine where additional monitoring may be needed.
For Oklahoma producers, the message is one of awareness rather than alarm.
As of this writing, no cases have been confirmed in Oklahoma. Even so, Oklahoma shares a long border with Texas, and livestock routinely move throughout the region for sales, breeding, shows and grazing. That makes vigilance especially important during fly season.
Routine herd checks have always been one of the best management tools available, and they are even more valuable now. Fresh wounds should be treated promptly and monitored until they heal. Newly branded or processed cattle deserve extra attention, as do newborn calves, horses with injuries, sheep after shearing and any animal recovering from surgery or trauma. Wildlife can also serve as hosts, making complete prevention impossible, but early detection can make all the difference.
If producers suspect screwworm, they should avoid simply treating the wound and moving on. Instead, they should contact their veterinarian or the Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food and Forestry so the case can be evaluated and, if necessary, samples collected. Rapid reporting is one of the most effective tools available for limiting the spread of the pest.
Perhaps the most encouraging part of this story is that agriculture has faced this challenge before—and won.
The same science that eliminated New World screwworm from the United States decades ago is once again being deployed. Researchers understand the insect’s life cycle. Veterinarians know what to look for. Producers are better connected than ever through Extension services and state animal health agencies.
Screwworm may have returned to the United States, but so have the tools that defeated it the first time.
For Oklahoma livestock producers, the best response is also the simplest: keep an eye on your animals, don’t ignore wounds that aren’t healing, and report anything that doesn’t look right. When it comes to screwworm, finding one case early is far better than finding many too late.
Farm & Ranch
History of the Steel Plow
Few inventions changed the face of American agriculture as much as the steel plow. To settlers moving westward in the 19th century, the fertile black soils of the Midwest and Great Plains looked promising, but farming them proved nearly impossible with the tools of the day. Wooden and cast-iron plows stuck, broke, or clogged in the thick sod. That all changed in 1837 when a Vermont-born blacksmith named John Deere hammered out a new kind of plow with a polished steel blade. His design cut the earth clean, shed the sticky prairie soil, and opened vast new regions – including Oklahoma and Texas – to farming.
Early plows had served farmers in the eastern United States well enough. Wooden moldboards or cast iron blades could turn light, sandy soils. But when settlers reached the tallgrass prairies, they met a stubborn enemy: a dense mat of roots, sometimes several inches thick, holding sod together like a woven carpet. Trying to pull a wooden or iron plow through it was slow, exhausting work. Soil clung to the blade, forcing constant stops to scrape it clean. Even strong teams of oxen could only manage short furrows before the plow failed.
John Deere, working in Grand Detour, Illinois, spotted a solution. Drawing on his blacksmith skills, he repurposed a broken saw blade and shaped it into a curved plowshare. Unlike rough iron, the highly polished steel let the sticky prairie soil slip cleanly off with each pass. His first prototype, built in 1837, was followed by commercial models within a few years. Farmers who tested them quickly spread the word.
By the 1840s, Deere’s “self-scouring” plows were in high demand. They allowed a farmer to cut deep into prairie sod, overturning wide furrows that aerated the soil and prepared it for planting. What had once taken days of backbreaking work could now be done in hours. The barrier of tough sod, which had limited settlement and discouraged cultivation, was broken.
As thousands of families streamed westward after the Civil War, they carried Deere plows – or imitations of them – on wagons and trains. By the time Oklahoma was opened to settlement in the late 1800s, the steel plow was already a fixture on homesteads. In North Texas, it helped transform open prairie into wheat, corn, and cotton fields.
From Tool to Transformation
The steel plow was not just a better blade; it was a turning point in the history of American agriculture. By making prairie soils farmable, it opened millions of acres to cultivation. Wheat and corn production surged, fueling both local economies and national markets.
In Oklahoma and Texas, the plow shaped settlement patterns. Towns sprang up around fertile farmland, and railroads laid lines to carry grain and cotton to distant buyers. Farmers who once raised just enough for their families began producing surpluses. The steel plow helped push the U.S. toward becoming a global agricultural power.
But the story was not without consequences. Breaking the sod meant breaking the natural cover that had held prairie ecosystems together for centuries. Grasslands that had supported bison and protected soils were replaced with monoculture crops. While the plow unlocked prosperity, it also set the stage for soil erosion and, decades later, the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.
Culturally, the steel plow became a symbol of progress. John Deere himself built a company that still bears his name, and the green-and-yellow brand became synonymous with farming. Homesteaders told stories of how the polished blade “sang through the sod,” making it possible to turn dreams into harvests.
Even today, antique Deere plows stand in museums, barns, and pastures as reminders of the first great tool of prairie agriculture. Many families keep them as heirlooms, rusted but intact, a testament to the determination of those who first broke the land.
The steel plow was more than a piece of iron and wood. It was a key that unlocked the Great Plains, shaping the settlement of Oklahoma, Texas, and much of the West. It allowed farming where farming once seemed impossible, bringing prosperity and growth, but also altering landscapes in ways that would echo for generations.
Like barbed wire and windmills, the steel plow is part of the story of how ingenuity and necessity met on the frontier. It reminds us that every invention carries both promise and responsibility, and that the land we farm today still bears the marks of tools first forged nearly two centuries ago.
References
Deere & Company. Company History. https://www.deere.com
Smith, Philip. The Emergence of Agriculture in the Great Plains. University of Oklahoma Press, 1986.
Library of Congress. John Deere and the Invention of the Steel Plow.
National Museum of American History. “Plowing the Plains.” Smithsonian Institution.
Oklahoma Historical Society. Agriculture and Settlement in Oklahoma.
-
Country Lifestyle2 years agoJuly 2017 Profile: J.W. Hart
-
Attractions9 years ago48 Hours in Atoka Remembered
-
Farm & Ranch2 years agoFrom Plow to Plentiful: The Most Important Inventions in Agricultural History
-
Equine9 years agoUmbilical Hernia
-
Country Lifestyle5 years agoThe Two Sides of Colten Jesse
-
Outdoors8 years agoGrazing Oklahoma: Honey Locust
-
Farm & Ranch8 years agoHackberry (Celtis spp.)
-
Equine6 years agoOn the Road with Emily Miller-Beisel





