Farm & Ranch
Recently Completed Reclamation Project is Excellent Example of Abandoned Mine Land Work in Oklahoma
Some believe you can’t go back in time.
However, that’s exactly what the Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Program does. In this case, they’ve returned nearly 24 acres to productive use that were surface mined for coal over 45 years ago.
Construction on the Owen-Cherokee West Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation project in the Muskogee County Conservation District reached completion on July 20 and two days later the Final Inspection of the Project in eastern Oklahoma was held. The concluding phases of the project included: the final grading stage of earth work, the installation of rip rap, rock check dams, and fencing. A dangerous highwall and a hazardous waterbody have been removed from the site. This project is in a highly visible location at an intersection with heavily traveled county roads. The property has been dramatically improved, and the landscape conforms to the natural environment with the elimination of significant health and safety hazards. Approximately 23.5 acres of land have been reshaped and reclaimed.
Robert Toole, Oklahoma Conservation Commission Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Program Director, said this project is a good example of AML work in various ways.
From a technical standpoint, the Oklahoma AML Program secured the right-of-entry for the private property needed for the project. They then designed the plans, coordinated the environmental clearances, contracted the second American Burying Beetle survey, contracted the construction, inspected construction, prepared the vegetative plan, coordinated the vegetative services and inspected the vegetative treatment application.
From a partnership standpoint, the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 (SMCRA) established a cooperative federalism approach to abandoned coal mine reclamation.
Toole said, “This project is a prime example of how well that approach works to address abandoned mine land reclamation on any land in Oklahoma.”
The project was a partnership effort involving the Cherokee Nation, the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement, the Oklahoma Conservation Commission, the Muskogee County Conservation District and private landowners.
The work area involved Cherokee Nation abandoned mine land that needed maintenance for which the Office of Surface Mining Reclamation and Enforcement (OSMRE) was providing technical assistance.
“The maintenance treatment necessary to alleviate the problems required the involvement of adjacent private property abandoned mine land for which the Oklahoma AML Program had authority to reclaim,” Toole said. “Through a Cooperative Agreement, the OSMRE coordinated the involvement of the Cherokee Nation land and the Oklahoma AML Program coordinated the inclusion of the private property land. Funding was jointly provided by OSMRE for the Cherokee Nation land acreage and by the Oklahoma AML Program for the private land acreage.”
Toole added, “In collaboration with OSMRE, the Oklahoma AML Program designed the Cherokee Nation land maintenance treatment in coordination with the abandoned mine land reclamation of the private land to create a contiguous work area that addressed the needs of all interests to the maximum extent possible.”
The Oklahoma AML Program then performed all project management including contracting, construction inspection and vegetative treatment oversight. The Muskogee County Conservation District served as the vegetative contractor to secure the best vegetative services available. This cooperative project involved the federal government, state government, local government, tribal government and private landowners.
“It doesn’t get much more partnership than that and yet it worked very efficiently and effectively with the Oklahoma AML Program coordinating communications, input and project management,” Toole said.
Those who participated in the final inspection at the site included: Butch Garner, Muskogee County Conservation District Chair; Pat Gwin, Cherokee Nation; LaChelle Harris, OSMRE Tulsa FO; Lee Owens, landowner; Valerie Rogers, OCC-AML Engineer; Tracy Reeder, OCC-AML Construction Supervisor; Trampas Tripp, OCC-AML Program Assistant/Project Inspector, and Toole, OCC-AML Program Director.
Discussions between AML and OSMRE about this project began in 2017, and the Cooperative Agreement was executed the following year (2018). The notice to begin construction was given on January 5, 2021 and was completed in July.
This reclamation project was part private landowner and part Cherokee Nation land.
Such projects afford many opportunities for producers, sometimes it is business related, sometimes it is more quality of life. Owens, the private landowner, said a neighbor cuts the hay on her land and this will provide more land for that use. Plus, the reclamation opens the door for use by her grandchildren as they make memories.
“This was a wooded area before, but now this gives us easier access to my other acreage for the grandkids to go fishing,” she said, followed by a big smile.
The AML mission
The mission of Oklahoma’s Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Program is to protect lives, repair scarred land and improve the environment. Twenty-six (26) known deaths have occurred in the state on abandoned coal mines. Oklahoma has over $120 million in reclamation that needs to be addressed and receives only $3 million per year. The authority provided by the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977 as amended to collect fees to fund AML reclamation expires in September 2021. If the Act is not reauthorized, Oklahoma will have millions of dollars of hazardous abandoned coal mine sites left unreclaimed.
AML achievements to date includes: 187 completed projects; 5,520.7 acres reclaimed; 320,048 linear feet of dangerous highwall reclaimed; 258 hazardous water bodies reclaimed; 223 subsidence sites reclaimed; 22 hazardous structures removed; 397 mine openings closed; 16 miles of clean streams restored.
Looking back
Coal mining started in Oklahoma in 1872, taking place primarily in a 16-county area on the eastern side of the state. Early production came almost entirely from underground mines, but with the development of larger power equipment, surface mining became the preferred approach and continues to be the primary mining method used in the state. Over 32,000 acres of land have been used for surface mining and another 40,000 acres have been used for underground mining, resulting in many abandoned mining sites that threaten the environment as well as Oklahomans’ health and safety.
For years, conservation district directors in eastern Oklahoma voiced their concerns about these unclaimed mined areas and spoke to local lawmakers about legislation to address the issue. This advocacy led to the passage of the Open Cut Land Reclamation Act in 1968, which required leveling only the tops of spoil ridges to a width of 10 feet, a requirement that many deemed inadequate. In 1971 these reclamation guidelines were strengthened to require “a rolling topography traversable by machines or equipment commonly used with the land after reclamation.” Still dissatisfied by this requirement, conservation district directors and other environmental advocates turned to Congress for assistance in passing more robust mine reclamation legislation.
On August 3, 1977, President Jimmy Carter signed Public Law 95-87, known as the Surface Mining Control and Reclamation Act of 1977. This legislation created a national system for controlling the surface effects of active coal mining and established a trust fund dedicated to reclaiming hazardous orphan coal mine land. The trust is funded by fees on active coal mining that are set to end in 2021.
Within months of Public Law 95-87 passing, Governor David Boren designated the Oklahoma Conservation Commission as the state agency responsible for reclaiming abandoned coal mine land in Oklahoma. On May 19, 1981, Governor George Nigh signed Senate Bill 217 implementing the Abandoned Mine Land (AML) Program in Oklahoma, which was subsequently approved by Cecil Andrus, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior at the time. Oklahoma is one of the few states where conservation districts are integrally involved with AML reclamation efforts. These efforts are 100 percent federally funded from fees on active coal mine production.
Take for example, projects of the past…
There have been many other successes through the years. Here are a couple of those:
The Lindsay AML Project is located near Claremore, Oklahoma, close to the Oologah Reservoir in Rogers County. A 50-foot final-cut highwall and pit paralleled the road to the reservoir. With considerable residential development in the area, there was a strong potential for an accident. The pit was backfilled using the on-site spoil piles, eliminating 2,700 linear feet of highwall. A total of 37 acres was reclaimed at a cost of $227,114. The project was completed August 12, 1992.
The Bill Tipple Civil Penalty Project is adjacent to Highway 10 near Welch, Oklahoma, in Craig County. The site was an abandoned coal-processing facility with many dilapidated structures and equipment creating safety hazards. The presence of approximately 15,000 cubic yards of acid-forming surface coal refuse posed a major threat to the underlying groundwater aquifer as well as a public health hazard. The site was eligible for funding under the federally administered civil penalty program. Hazardous structures and equipment were either salvaged or buried. The coal refuse was buried with a minimum 2-foot clay cover. A total of 55 acres was reclaimed at a cost of $201,285.70. It was completed August 26, 1993.
Of the Owen-Cherokee West Reclamation project, Toole said, “This project is a model for performing abandoned coal mine land reclamation on any land in Oklahoma through the Oklahoma Conservation Commission Abandoned Mine Land Reclamation Program.”
Farm & Ranch
Winter Water Solutions
Winter brings its own set of challenges. For ranchers and horse owners, few are more pressing than keeping water available. Cold weather, frozen tanks, and ice buildup can cut animals off from the single most important nutrient. Cattle can survive on short pasture and horses can get by on hay, but without water, everything stops. Hydration affects digestion, body temperature regulation, and overall health. That’s why every winter, producers across Oklahoma and North Texas turn their focus to one essential question: how do you keep water flowing when the mercury drops?
The struggle against frozen water isn’t new. Generations before electricity, rural families learned to outsmart the cold with ingenuity and grit.
Chopping Ice – One of the oldest solutions was also the most labor-intensive: grabbing an ax or a bar and breaking ice daily. While effective, this method demands constant attention and becomes impractical during long cold snaps. Horses and cattle can quickly fall behind on intake if a rancher misses even a few hours.
Windmills and Groundwater – Traditional windmills pumping from underground aquifers often provided water that was warmer than surface tanks, since groundwater stays at a relatively stable temperature year-round. Many old ranches still rely on this method, though windmill upkeep is a challenge in itself.
Insulated or Buried Lines – Families learned to bury water lines below the frost line or wrap them with insulating material. That practice continues today, and it remains one of the most effective long-term strategies for preventing frozen pipes.
Floating Devices – Ranchers also improvised with floating logs, balls, or even old tires in stock tanks. The movement helped keep ice from sealing solid and gave livestock a space to drink. While not foolproof, the idea is still used in remote areas.
These methods show the persistence of rural people, but modern technology has added new tools to the fight.
Today, ranchers and horse owners have a wide menu of winter water solutions, ranging from simple add-ons to major investments.
Heated Waterers – Electric or propane-powered waterers remain the most reliable way to ensure animals never face ice. Available in tank heaters, floating units, or fully enclosed automatic waterers, they keep temperatures above freezing even during prolonged cold. The trade-off is cost: electricity bills can spike, and in rural areas, running lines to distant tanks may not be practical. Still, for barns, lots, and heavily used pastures, heated waterers are a standard tool.
Solar Solutions – Where electricity isn’t available, solar-powered heaters have gained traction. Panels run small heating elements or pumps, reducing reliance on grid power. Though initial costs are high, they provide independence and sustainability, especially in sunny but cold climates.
Geothermal Systems – Some operations use earth’s steady underground temperature to keep water from freezing. By burying lines or tanks and tapping into geothermal exchange, water stays at safe levels without heavy energy use. These systems are especially effective when designed into new construction.
Automatic Waterers with Constant Flow – In some cases, ranchers use systems that keep water trickling constantly. Movement prevents ice buildup, though it can waste water if not carefully managed. This method works best where water supply is abundant and low-cost.
Tank Additives – While chemicals are never recommended for human or animal safety, some producers use nontoxic dyes or floating covers to limit algae and ice. These are niche options, but they illustrate the creativity at play.
Practical Ranch Hacks – Many ranchers mix and match. Submersible de-icers paired with insulated tank covers, old truck hoods repurposed as windbreaks, or even placing tanks on south-facing slopes to maximize sun exposure can make the difference between usable and frozen water.
Why does all this matter so much? Because winter dehydration can have cascading effects. Horses, for instance, are prone to impaction colic when water intake drops. Cattle that can’t drink freely eat less feed, lose weight, and struggle to maintain body condition. Calves and older animals are especially vulnerable. Even wildlife around a farm benefits from accessible water sources.
Beyond animal health, reliable winter water reduces labor stress. Instead of breaking ice in multiple tanks at dawn and dusk, producers with dependable systems can focus on feeding, calving prep, or other winter tasks. In a season where daylight is short and weather unpredictable, those saved hours are invaluable.
Water is the lifeblood of the ranch, and winter tests every producer’s ability to keep it flowing. From chopping ice with an ax to installing solar-powered heaters, solutions have evolved, but the goal is the same: hydration without interruption.
For some, a floating log and a good bar might still get the job done. For others, investment in heated automatic waterers pays off every year. The choice depends on herd size, geography, and budget. What unites them is the understanding that winter water is not optional. It is essential, and it always will be.
References
Oklahoma State University Extension. Winter Livestock Water Management. https://extension.okstate.edu
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension. Cold Weather Livestock Care. https://agrilifeextension.tamu.edu
University of Minnesota Extension. Horse Hydration and Colic in Winter.
USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service. Livestock Watering Systems.
Aermotor Windmill Company. Windmills and Water Supply.
Farm & Ranch
History of the Steel Plow
Few inventions changed the face of American agriculture as much as the steel plow. To settlers moving westward in the 19th century, the fertile black soils of the Midwest and Great Plains looked promising, but farming them proved nearly impossible with the tools of the day. Wooden and cast-iron plows stuck, broke, or clogged in the thick sod. That all changed in 1837 when a Vermont-born blacksmith named John Deere hammered out a new kind of plow with a polished steel blade. His design cut the earth clean, shed the sticky prairie soil, and opened vast new regions – including Oklahoma and Texas – to farming.
Early plows had served farmers in the eastern United States well enough. Wooden moldboards or cast iron blades could turn light, sandy soils. But when settlers reached the tallgrass prairies, they met a stubborn enemy: a dense mat of roots, sometimes several inches thick, holding sod together like a woven carpet. Trying to pull a wooden or iron plow through it was slow, exhausting work. Soil clung to the blade, forcing constant stops to scrape it clean. Even strong teams of oxen could only manage short furrows before the plow failed.
John Deere, working in Grand Detour, Illinois, spotted a solution. Drawing on his blacksmith skills, he repurposed a broken saw blade and shaped it into a curved plowshare. Unlike rough iron, the highly polished steel let the sticky prairie soil slip cleanly off with each pass. His first prototype, built in 1837, was followed by commercial models within a few years. Farmers who tested them quickly spread the word.
By the 1840s, Deere’s “self-scouring” plows were in high demand. They allowed a farmer to cut deep into prairie sod, overturning wide furrows that aerated the soil and prepared it for planting. What had once taken days of backbreaking work could now be done in hours. The barrier of tough sod, which had limited settlement and discouraged cultivation, was broken.
As thousands of families streamed westward after the Civil War, they carried Deere plows – or imitations of them – on wagons and trains. By the time Oklahoma was opened to settlement in the late 1800s, the steel plow was already a fixture on homesteads. In North Texas, it helped transform open prairie into wheat, corn, and cotton fields.
From Tool to Transformation
The steel plow was not just a better blade; it was a turning point in the history of American agriculture. By making prairie soils farmable, it opened millions of acres to cultivation. Wheat and corn production surged, fueling both local economies and national markets.
In Oklahoma and Texas, the plow shaped settlement patterns. Towns sprang up around fertile farmland, and railroads laid lines to carry grain and cotton to distant buyers. Farmers who once raised just enough for their families began producing surpluses. The steel plow helped push the U.S. toward becoming a global agricultural power.
But the story was not without consequences. Breaking the sod meant breaking the natural cover that had held prairie ecosystems together for centuries. Grasslands that had supported bison and protected soils were replaced with monoculture crops. While the plow unlocked prosperity, it also set the stage for soil erosion and, decades later, the Dust Bowl of the 1930s.
Culturally, the steel plow became a symbol of progress. John Deere himself built a company that still bears his name, and the green-and-yellow brand became synonymous with farming. Homesteaders told stories of how the polished blade “sang through the sod,” making it possible to turn dreams into harvests.
Even today, antique Deere plows stand in museums, barns, and pastures as reminders of the first great tool of prairie agriculture. Many families keep them as heirlooms, rusted but intact, a testament to the determination of those who first broke the land.
The steel plow was more than a piece of iron and wood. It was a key that unlocked the Great Plains, shaping the settlement of Oklahoma, Texas, and much of the West. It allowed farming where farming once seemed impossible, bringing prosperity and growth, but also altering landscapes in ways that would echo for generations.
Like barbed wire and windmills, the steel plow is part of the story of how ingenuity and necessity met on the frontier. It reminds us that every invention carries both promise and responsibility, and that the land we farm today still bears the marks of tools first forged nearly two centuries ago.
References
Deere & Company. Company History. https://www.deere.com
Smith, Philip. The Emergence of Agriculture in the Great Plains. University of Oklahoma Press, 1986.
Library of Congress. John Deere and the Invention of the Steel Plow.
National Museum of American History. “Plowing the Plains.” Smithsonian Institution.
Oklahoma Historical Society. Agriculture and Settlement in Oklahoma.
Farm & Ranch
Fish in the Water Trough
Many ranchers across North Texas have discovered an easy, natural way to keep water troughs cleaner: add a few fish. It might sound like something from a backyard pond hobby, but keeping hardy fish such as goldfish or small koi in livestock troughs can help reduce algae, control insects, and even provide a little entertainment during daily chores.
The main benefit of adding fish is algae control. When sunlight hits the water and nutrients from dust, hay, or manure accumulate, algae blooms can appear quickly, especially in warm weather. Fish feed on the small organisms that make up the base of that algae growth. Goldfish, minnows, and koi are particularly effective at grazing on microscopic material and keeping buildup manageable.
Another advantage is mosquito control. In summer, stagnant water attracts mosquitoes, which lay eggs along the edges of the trough. A few small fish will eat the larvae before they hatch, breaking the cycle before it starts.
There’s also an element of simple enjoyment. Watching fish dart around beneath the water adds a bit of life to the barnyard, and they’re surprisingly hardy if cared for properly. Many livestock owners say once they’ve added fish, they never go back to fishless troughs.
Despite the practical benefits, there are some important considerations before stocking your trough. The success of fish in small water containers depends on size, sunlight, and maintenance.
Smaller troughs heat and cool quickly, so temperature swings can stress fish. Metal troughs exposed to full sun get hotter than shaded plastic or concrete ones. When possible, locate the trough where it gets partial shade and is deep enough for fish to retreat from temperature extremes.
Choosing and Caring for Fish
Goldfish are the most common choice because they tolerate temperature changes, low oxygen levels, and variable water conditions better than most species. They’re inexpensive, easy to find, and don’t require a filtration system if the water is changed regularly.
A few general guidelines make the difference between a thriving setup and a short-lived one:
Begin with only two or three fish per 100 gallons of water. Overcrowding leads to oxygen depletion, which is the main reason fish die in troughs.
Feed stores and local pet shops often sell small feeder goldfish or minnows at low cost. Avoid releasing fish from ornamental ponds or unknown sources, since they may introduce disease or parasites.
Fish should adjust slowly to temperature differences between the water they came in and the trough. Float the transport bag in the trough for 15–20 minutes, then add small amounts of trough water before releasing them.
Most fish will find enough to eat naturally — algae, insects, and organic debris. Supplementing food isn’t necessary and can actually foul the water.
While fish help limit algae, they don’t eliminate it. Every few weeks, scrub the sides of the trough lightly and refill it completely to maintain water quality. When cleaning, move the fish temporarily to a bucket with some of their old water to minimize stress.
If you use bleach, copper sulfate, or any algaecide in your tanks, the fish will not survive. Once fish are introduced, rely on natural cleaning and partial water changes instead of additives.
Most animals quickly get used to fish in their tanks and don’t bother them. If a horse or cow tends to stir the water excessively or dump feed in the trough, install a section of wire mesh or a large rock area for the fish to hide under.
Winter Care and Cold-Weather Survival
A common question is what to do when temperatures drop. In most of North Texas, you can leave the fish in the trough all winter. They tolerate cold far better than people expect.
When the water temperature falls, fish become sluggish and sink to the bottom where the water remains slightly warmer. Even when ice forms on top, they usually survive without issue as long as the trough isn’t completely frozen solid.
If your tanks regularly freeze over, here are a few tips:
Keep a small opening in the ice to allow oxygen exchange. You can gently pour a small pot of warm (not boiling) water on one spot or set in a floating object so the ice forms around it and leaves a gap.
Avoid breaking thick ice with force. The shock and vibration can stress or kill fish.
Don’t move the fish indoors unless the tank will freeze solid. Sudden temperature changes are more harmful than cold water itself.
Fish can overwinter outside just fine if there’s some depth — at least 18 to 24 inches — and no complete freeze-through. In fact, many people report their fish living for several years in the same trough, even through occasional hard freezes.
If you use a stock tank heater for livestock, that’s perfectly fine for the fish too, as long as it doesn’t raise the water temperature dramatically. They’ll appreciate the small patch of open water and the stable oxygen exchange.
During cold months, fish won’t need food. Their metabolism slows, and uneaten feed can decay and foul the water. Once temperatures climb again in spring, they’ll become more active.
Even with the best care, fish sometimes die suddenly due to poor water quality or low oxygen. Murky water, slimy buildup, or a sulfur-like smell are warning signs. Dumping and refilling the tank usually fixes the problem. If losses are frequent, check for contamination from feed, manure, or chemicals.
It’s also worth knowing that goldfish reproduce quickly. If your trough has a gravel bottom or lots of algae, you might end up with more fish than you started with by midsummer. A few extra can be rehomed in a garden pond or given away, but be careful not to release them into creeks or natural ponds — that can harm native species.
Adding fish to water troughs isn’t new, but more landowners are rediscovering its usefulness. It’s a low-maintenance, inexpensive, and surprisingly effective way to help keep tanks clearer, reduce insects, and add a little charm to daily chores.
For the most part, the system takes care of itself. A handful of goldfish or minnows, a little common sense, and routine cleaning are all it takes. Come winter, just leave them be — odds are they’ll be waiting under the ice when spring rolls around, ready to start another season of quiet work in your stock tank.
References
Texas A&M AgriLife Extension – Managing Water Quality for Livestock and Wildlife.
Oklahoma State University Extension – Farm Pond Ecology and Fish Care Basics.
Texas Parks & Wildlife Department – Small Pond and Trough Fish Management Guidelines.
North Central Texas Council of Governments – Water Conservation for Rural Landowners.
Oklahoma Department of Agriculture, Food & Forestry – Livestock Water Tank Maintenance Resources.
-
Country Lifestyle1 year agoJuly 2017 Profile: J.W. Hart
-
Attractions8 years ago48 Hours in Atoka Remembered
-
Equine8 years agoUmbilical Hernia
-
Country Lifestyle4 years agoThe Two Sides of Colten Jesse
-
Outdoors8 years agoGrazing Oklahoma: Honey Locust
-
Farm & Ranch7 years agoHackberry (Celtis spp.)
-
Country Lifestyle9 years agoThe House a Treasure Built
-
Equine5 years agoOn the Road with Emily Miller-Beisel





