Connect with us

Outdoors

Why Natural History Collections and Surveys Matter Today

Published

on

By Mike Proctor
Senior Research Associate 1

A little more than 100 years ago, G.W. Stevens traveled across Oklahoma collecting plant specimens as the director of the Oklahoma State Botanical Survey. A portion of his first collecting trip brought him through Love and Carter counties, where several of the ranches operated by Noble Research Institute are located, ranches where I’ve spent much of the last nine years involved in various research projects.

Stevens’ field survey was the first major undertaking to identify what plants occurred in Oklahoma. Up until that point and for the next 50 years or so, the study of natural history mostly revolved around two questions: what and where. In other words, finding out what species were present and where they occurred. The only way to answer those questions was to go out and collect specimens which then were dried, mounted and deposited in herbariums, usually at universities. While people could come along and make maps or study the anatomy of all the specimens of a particular species, nothing really exciting happened in those collections.

As new technologies were developed and improved in the 1980s and ’90s, the attention shifted to looking at how species and groups were related to one another based on DNA and pollen analysis. This was pretty attractive to folks because it all took place under air conditioning and didn’t involve chiggers and ticks. Tissue samples for a study could easily be extracted from preserved herbarium specimens. Natural history studies dropped off dramatically and are continuing to decline.

There are a lot of questions out there today that didn’t exist when G.W. Stevens and other early collectors were stumbling around through the prairies and woods of Oklahoma. Natural history collections and surveys can contribute a great deal to the answers.

VEGETATION REFLECTS ECOSYSTEM HEALTH

From historical collections and newer samples collected in particular habitats, we can begin to develop a concept of ecosystem health. How many native species are present versus non-natives? How closely do the species present today represent those documented for the site in the past? How have environmental changes affected native vegetation? How have land use practices influenced native vegetation? What can be inferred from the current vegetation about historical land use?

If we detect a difference — some species are absent that were present and new species have appeared — we can ask: What about this site has changed? How rapidly are changes taking place? Can we implement management practices to reverse the changes? Rarely do species invade an intact community. There is usually some disturbance that has taken place that sets the stage. Often the culprit is overgrazing, but it also may be something like a lack of fire. For example, eastern redcedar takes advantage of both situations and causes havoc by invading grassland plant communities.

A great deal of information about the status of vertebrate and invertebrate species can be inferred by the status of the plant communities present. In most cases, the plant community is the habitat for those species. If it’s gone, they’re gone.

During field work in the heavily forested Big Thicket in southeast Texas, I occasionally came across single pitcher plants under closed-canopy pine forests. If they’re only supposed to grow in pine savannas, why were they growing in the middle of the forest? Fires had been suppressed for so long that the pines had taken over the original savannas, which were the habitat for the pitcher plants. I was finding relict populations. Collections data can let us know where such habitats once occurred and where they might occur again, if properly managed.

Collecting Provides Insight Into Invasive and Endangered Species When dealing with invasive species, other questions arise. Have those species always been around, or are they introduced? When did they first turn up? If they have always been around, why are they causing problems now? What has changed? How fast is the change occurring? Collections data can help answer those questions as well.

Natural history collections may also provide insight into endangered species that are particular about where they live. Data on specimen labels about geology and soils can be put into a GIS system and analyzed to locate other potential sites where those species might be found or could be reintroduced. It is also possible that what we thought was an endangered species based on museum collections isn’t nearly as endangered once someone starts to focus on collecting them. Many organisms are easy to overlook and just are seldom collected.

COLLECTING HELPS ANSWER BIODIVERSITY QUESTIONS

How many species occur on a site? Do some appear only during or after really dry periods, or really wet ones? Several native forbs dramatically increase in abundance after fires. It’s not that they are suddenly invading, but it’s how that plant community is responding to fire. After every fire, those species behave in that fashion. Two years after the fire, the forbs will once more be minor components of that community. Some of the species occurring on a site don’t show up every year, or even every decade. Seeds remain viable in the soil for extended periods of time and may germinate only when conditions are just right. This may occur only when the overhead canopy has been removed, such as in the case of a fire or after a severe drought.

Collecting in an area, even over an entire season, still doesn’t capture all of the biodiversity that is likely to be present there. I’m specifically referring to plants here, but I think that trend holds true for whatever group of organisms one might study. Collecting is the only way to answer many biodiversity questions. We use some other technologies such as camera surveys or acoustic surveys to help measure biodiversity with animals, but they don’t work with plants.

Read more in the December issue of Oklahoma Farm & Ranch.

Continue Reading

Outdoors

Managing Aquatic Plants in Farm Ponds

Published

on

Aquatic vegetation can make a pond look messy, but plant growth in the water is not always a problem. In fact, some vegetation is good for most ponds. The issue is not whether plants are present. The issue is what kind of plants they are, how much of the pond they cover and what the landowner wants the pond to do.

A pond used mainly for fishing, livestock water or wildlife habitat can benefit from a moderate amount of aquatic vegetation. Plants help stabilize banks, reduce erosion, provide cover for fish and wildlife, improve water clarity and give insects, frogs and other small creatures a place to live. A pond with no vegetation at all may look clean, but it may not be as healthy or productive as it appears.

On the other hand, too much vegetation can interfere with fishing, watering livestock, swimming, irrigation or general enjoyment of the pond. Dense plant growth can make it difficult for fish to move and for anglers to cast. It can clog pumps or water lines. In some situations, it can also contribute to low oxygen problems, especially if large amounts of vegetation die and begin to decompose.

That is why pond management starts with the goal. A catfish production pond may need very little vegetation. A waterfowl pond may benefit from heavy coverage of certain plants. A typical farm or ranch pond used for livestock water and fishing usually does best with a middle ground. The right amount depends on the pond’s purpose.

The best time to prevent aquatic plant problems is when the pond is built or renovated. Many aquatic plants are limited by water depth. Shallow water allows sunlight to reach the bottom, which encourages plant growth. Deeper water reduces that opportunity. The Noble Research Institute article notes that many plant problems can be prevented by shaping most pond banks to a 20 to 25 percent slope down to at least four or five feet of depth.

That does not mean every pond can or should be rebuilt. Draining and reshaping an existing pond just to deal with weeds is usually not practical. But for landowners building a new pond, depth and bank slope are important decisions. Shallow edges may look gentle and easy to access, but they often become prime spots for unwanted plant growth. If livestock use the pond, fencing can help keep cattle from breaking down the banks and creating more shallow, muddy areas.

Once a pond has too much vegetation, there are usually three broad options: change the pond environment, use fish that eat plants or apply aquatic herbicides.

Changing the pond environment means making conditions less favorable for plant growth. Aquatic plants need sunlight and nutrients. Pond dyes can reduce sunlight penetration and limit the growth of submerged plants. Muddy water can have a similar effect, but muddy water is rarely the best solution. It may reduce plant growth, but it can also create water quality problems and lower fish production.

Fertilization is another tool sometimes used to encourage a phytoplankton bloom. A bloom can shade the pond bottom and tie up nutrients, limiting the growth of some submerged plants. This approach requires care. Too much fertility can create oxygen problems, fish stress or algae issues. Pond fertilization should not be a casual guess. Landowners considering this route should talk with a fisheries biologist before starting.

Grass carp are often used for aquatic vegetation control. These fish feed on many types of aquatic plants and can be useful in the right pond. They are not a perfect solution for every situation. Grass carp do not eat all plant species equally, and stocking too many can remove more vegetation than desired. Landowners should check state rules before stocking them, since regulations may apply.

Goldfish may help reduce filamentous algae in small ponds or stock tanks that do not contain larger predator fish. The Noble article notes that goldfish reduced filamentous algae to acceptable levels in metal stock tanks at Noble’s Red River Demonstration and Research Farm. This may be a practical option in some small watering systems, but it is not a general answer for larger ponds.

Herbicides are another tool, but they need to be used carefully. The first step is identifying the plant. Different herbicides control different types of vegetation. A product that works on algae may not work on cattails. A product labeled for floating plants may not control submerged weeds. Accurate identification can save money and reduce damage to plants that are not causing problems.

Labels matter. Only products labeled for aquatic use should be applied in or around ponds. The label will explain rates, timing, water-use restrictions and safety precautions. Some products may limit when water can be used for livestock, irrigation or recreation after treatment. Landowners should read and follow the label every time.

Timing also matters. Treating a pond after weeds have already taken over can create a new problem. When large amounts of vegetation die at once, decomposition uses oxygen from the water. If oxygen drops too low, fish can die. This risk is highest in hot weather because warm water holds less oxygen. In most cases, treating smaller areas or acting earlier in the growing season is safer than waiting until the pond is covered.

Not every plant needs to be removed. Some shoreline plants protect banks and provide habitat. Some submerged plants help small fish avoid predators. Some floating plants provide shade and cover. The goal should be control, not always elimination. A completely bare pond can be less useful for fish and wildlife.

Landowners should also look at what is feeding the plant growth. Runoff from fertilized fields, lawns, corrals or feeding areas can add nutrients to the pond. Livestock standing in the water can stir sediment, damage banks and contribute manure. Fixing those sources may help reduce future plant problems. Buffer strips of grass and vegetation around the pond can help filter runoff before it reaches the water.

Aquatic vegetation is easiest to manage when landowners pay attention early. Walk the pond edges during the growing season. Notice where plants are starting, how fast they are spreading and whether they are interfering with the pond’s use. Take photos and, if needed, collect a sample for identification. County Extension offices, fisheries biologists and conservation professionals can often help determine what plant is present and what control options make sense.

A pond is a living system. Plants, fish, insects, livestock, wildlife, water depth and nutrients all affect one another. Managing aquatic vegetation is not just about killing weeds. It is about keeping the pond useful, healthy and balanced.

For most farm and ranch ponds, some vegetation is a benefit. Too much becomes a problem. The key is knowing the difference and choosing the right tool before a small issue takes over the water.

Continue Reading

Outdoors

Cup Plant

Published

on

By Norman Winter | The Garden Guy

When it comes to the backyard wildlife habitat, the cup plant has it all. To me, it is the flag bearer perennial for bees, butterflies, and birds. It is a stalwart native in 34 states from Louisiana north to Canada crossing every border east. Alas however its size is quite imposing. It is big, bold and wonderful, and this is the time of the year it shines the most.

If you are getting interested but are not familiar with the cup plant, it is known botanically as Silphium perfoliatum and as I alluded above cold hardy from zones 3-9. It can grow tall, 4 to 10 feet, and colonize, so it is a plant for the back of the border. Here at the Coastal Georgia Botanical Gardens ours are around 7 feet.

Though it may be hard to imagine, they can dwarf a brown-eyed Susan, Rudbeckia triloba, or a Brazilan sage, Salvia guaranitica, both also considered large plants and terrific partners for the cup plant. Close by, we have the pagoda flower Clerodendrum paniculatum, Java glory bower, Clerodendrum speciosissimum, as well as Baby Lace, Hydrangea paniculata, all of which do their part to bring in hummingbirds, bees, and butterflies.

You may be asking, why it’s called a cup plant. This is one of the magical attributes of the plant. As the plant grows, it develops large square stems that give the impression of piercing the center of the large leaves. It has two leaves without petioles that are attached to the stem, forming a perfect cup to collect rainwater. Small birds like finches take advantage of this natural reservoir of water. These same birds also feed on the seeds as they mature and get ready to disperse.

You’ll find the blooms to be covered in what may best be described as a pollinating frenzy. Every kind of bee, including honey bees by the hundreds, bumble bees, and wasps are there doing their thing. A quick glance on a recent morning visit showed eastern tiger swallowtails, long-tailed skippers, fiery skippers and yellow sulphur butterflies. It was like a Serengeti for pollinators. Though I didn’t see any, everyone reports hummingbirds on the plants as well.

The nature lover will find this to be one of the most thrilling plants to incorporate in the landscape. Get a chair, a pair of binoculars and a camera, and you are ready for a day of journaling. It will take some attitude adjustment for most gardeners before planting.

First, are you ready to incorporate such a tall, aster-family member into the back of the border? Second, can you accept a colonizing racehorse of a plant so to speak? Not only will you have rhizome spread but you will have reseeding. So, in other words, there will be some maintenance to confine to space allotted.

Native plant nurseries sell the plants, but they are also easy to start from seeds. Sow non-stratified seeds in the fall or stratified seeds in the spring. If you want to stratify, moisten coarse sand and seeds in a plastic bag and store in the refrigerator for three months.

Since this plant will be the backbone of your wildlife habitat or pollinator garden choose companions that are not only beautiful but will bring them in too. I’ve mentioned salvias and brown-eyed Susan’s, but Joe Pye weeds, milkweeds, and ironweeds native to your region would partner well.

Other favorites would be anise hyssops like Blue Fortune, Blue Boa, and Black Adder. They would give that complementary sizzle of opposite colors. Lastly, use the cup plant to create mystery in the garden by blocking a view and forming an area of transition.

The cup plant amazingly does it all for both wildlife and pollinators, all the while showing out with dazzling 3½-inch yellow blossoms. You have to agree that is pretty doggone special.

Continue Reading

Outdoors

Venomous Snakes of Oklahoma: What You’re Most Likely to Encounter

Published

on

Oklahoma is home to a wide range of wildlife, and snakes are a regular part of life for anyone who spends time outdoors. From ranchers and farmers to hunters, hikers, and rural landowners, most Oklahomans will eventually cross paths with a snake. While the majority of species found in the state are harmless, there are a handful that deserve extra respect.

Many people believe Oklahoma has only three venomous snake species. In reality, the state has seven venomous species, but they fall into three main groups that are helpful to understand: rattlesnakes, copperheads, and cottonmouths. All of Oklahoma’s venomous snakes belong to the pit viper family, meaning they share similar physical traits and hunting behaviors.

Knowing what these snakes look like, where they live, and how they behave goes a long way toward reducing the risk of an unpleasant encounter.

Rattlesnakes

Rattlesnakes are the most recognizable venomous snakes in Oklahoma, largely thanks to the rattle at the end of their tails. That rattle is designed as a warning system, alerting large animals — including people — that they are too close for comfort.

Oklahoma has several species of rattlesnakes, ranging from large, heavy-bodied snakes found in western parts of the state to smaller species that prefer grasslands and rocky areas. They are commonly encountered in open rangeland, rocky outcrops, brushy pastures, and along fence lines. Rattlesnakes are also known to seek shelter under equipment, boards, or debris, especially during extreme heat or cooler months.

Despite their reputation, rattlesnakes are not aggressive. They typically remain still and rely on camouflage until a threat gets too close. While the rattle is often used as a warning, it’s important to understand that a rattlesnake may not always rattle before striking. Some rattles are damaged or broken, and a snake that feels suddenly threatened may strike defensively without warning.

Rattlesnake venom is hemotoxic, meaning it damages tissue and affects blood clotting. Any bite should be treated as a medical emergency, even if symptoms initially seem mild.

Copperheads

Copperheads are among the most frequently encountered venomous snakes in Oklahoma, particularly in the eastern half of the state. They are masters of camouflage, blending easily into leaf litter, brush piles, wooded creek bottoms, and rocky terrain.

Most copperheads are relatively modest in size, typically measuring between one and three feet long. Their most recognizable feature is the pattern of darker bands along their bodies, often described as hourglass-shaped. This pattern helps them disappear into the forest floor, which is why copperheads are often stepped on accidentally.

Copperheads rely heavily on remaining still rather than fleeing, which increases the chance of a close encounter. Many bites occur when someone unknowingly steps near or directly on a snake that never attempted to move away.

Although copperhead venom is generally considered less potent than that of some rattlesnakes, bites are still serious and require immediate medical attention. Pain, swelling, and tissue damage are common, and prompt treatment can prevent complications.

Cottonmouths

Cottonmouths, also known as water moccasins, are Oklahoma’s primary semi-aquatic venomous snake. They are most often found near water sources such as slow-moving streams, ponds, swamps, and marshy areas, particularly in southeastern Oklahoma.

Cottonmouths are thick-bodied snakes that can grow several feet long. Their coloration is often dark, sometimes making them difficult to distinguish from nonvenomous water snakes. One defining behavior gives them their name: when threatened, a cottonmouth may open its mouth wide, displaying a bright white interior as a warning.

While cottonmouths are commonly associated with water, they do travel over land and may be encountered on trails, levees, or near livestock ponds. Like other pit vipers, they prefer to avoid confrontation and rely on defensive displays rather than aggression.

Cottonmouth venom is hemotoxic and can cause significant pain, swelling, and tissue damage. As with any venomous snakebite, immediate medical care is critical.

All of Oklahoma’s venomous snakes share several general characteristics. They have broad, triangular-shaped heads, heat-sensing pits between the eyes and nostrils, and vertical pupils. While these traits can help with identification, it’s safest to avoid attempting close inspection altogether.

Most snake bites happen when people try to kill, handle, or move snakes. Others occur when visibility is poor and a snake is accidentally surprised. Simple precautions can significantly reduce risk: watching where you step or reach, wearing boots in tall grass or rocky areas, and giving snakes plenty of space when they are spotted.

Venomous snakes play an important role in Oklahoma’s ecosystems by controlling rodent populations and maintaining balance among prey species. While it’s natural to feel uneasy around them, understanding their behavior helps replace fear with awareness.

Venomous snakes are a fact of life in rural Oklahoma, but encounters rarely end in injury when people remain alert and respectful. Recognizing that Oklahoma’s venomous snakes fall into three main groups — rattlesnakes, copperheads, and cottonmouths — makes identification simpler and helps people make safer decisions outdoors.

With a little knowledge and caution, Oklahomans can continue to work the land, enjoy the outdoors, and coexist with these often-misunderstood animals that have been part of the landscape long before fences, barns, or back roads ever existed.

Continue Reading
Ad
Ad
Ad

Trending