Farm & Ranch
The Barn
By Ralph Chain
In 1935 and 1936, when we used to work a lot of mules, my granddad and dad decided to build some mule barns. So, in 1935, we built the first barn where my dad lived and in 1936 we built a barn where my granddad lived. All the work on these barns was done by hand, back before we had cement mixers and the conveniences of life. The work was done by hoe or shovel.
Our neighbors, Sale and Dwight Bennett, and their dad, Claude, helped build the barns. The old man who laid the tile on the barn was Bill Hopper. He was an old bachelor and where he came from or where he went I do not know. But he stayed with my mother and father all during this time while building the west barn. It probably took two or three months to build a barn. He was particular about what he ate. My mother always had to cook for him, and she was glad to see him leave. He also laid the tile for my granddad’s barn. My grandmother cooked for him while he was building that barn.
We used the barn for mules until the late 1940s or early 1950s, when tractors took the place of our mules. I remember my dad trading a team of mules for a D John Deere tractor, which had steel wheel lugs on the back wheel, and you cranked it by hand. I think John Deere built these tractors and called them Argentine, because they were built for sale in Argentina.
When the mules left we converted the west barn. We took out the oat bins and mule stalls and moved our cattle working equipment inside the barn. Each barn had a long oat bin that ran the length of the barn. We filled these bins by scoop shovel with oats that were fed to our work mules.
We converted the east barn the same way but instead of moving our cattle working equipment I converted it to a sheep barn. We used to feed a lot of sheep, and we put the sheep feeders in the barn. Then we quit feeding sheep and the barn was converted into calving pens for our two-year-old heifers.
One day Newley, my grandson, approached me. He and Mandy Hill were getting married and he wanted to have the wedding in our converted school house. I asked him, “Why don’t you have your wedding in the barn?” He nearly fainted when I mentioned the barn. But I told him we would clean the barn up if he wanted to have the wedding there.
He needed to talk to Mandy’s mother, Glenda Hill, and see what she thought about it. She came and looked the barn over and said it if was cleaned up it would be all right. One of the biggest jobs was cleaning the hay out of the hay loft. Some of it had been there ever since the barn had been built. The only way to get it out was using pitchforks through a little door in the north part of the barn. It took three guys several months to get all the hay out of the loft.
It was amazing what they found in the hay. They found collars, harnesses and all kinds of mule and horse equipment. One of the main things they found was whiskey bottles, which had been hidden by some of the hands. They had hid them there because we didn’t believe in drinking.
Then the work started downstairs removing all the calving pens, and we poured a new cement floor. We got a steam cleaner and cleaned the walls, which helped a lot, and repaired some of the windows. On May 16, 1997, the wedding took place, and the reception was held in the hay loft. It went off great.
The barn has been used for all sorts of things from family reunions, hunting business, and special events for handicapped children. We have had people come from New York, California and even the Vice-President of Ecuador.
There is something always going on in the barn. The main event now is the Red Angus Sale that we have had for the past seven or eight years. There will be from 150 to 200 people in and out of the barn during the sale. Both barns are as good as they’ve ever been after 80 years. I don’t know of any other barns anywhere that are still standing after the horsepower went away and people starting using tractors. I can see no reason that the barns shouldn’t last another 80 years. Of course, a tornado or fire could destroy them in a matter of seconds.
Time changes things.
This article originally appeared in the September 2016 issue of Oklahoma Farm & Ranch.
Farm & Ranch
Acorn Toxicity
Barry Whitworth, DVM
Area Food/Animal Quality and Health
Specialist for Eastern Oklahoma
With the prolonged drought, most pastures in Oklahoma are in poor condition. With the lack of available forage, animals may go in search of alternative foods. If oak trees are in the pastures, acorns may be a favorite meal for some livestock this fall. This may result in oak poisoning.
Oak (Quercus species) leaves, twigs, buds, and acorns may be toxic to some animals when consumed. Obviously, acorns can be a problem in the fall and green acorns can be more toxic than mature acorns. When acorns form only a small portion of the diet, there are usually no signs of problems. However, consumption of large quantities may result in toxicity. Tannins in the acorns cause the toxicity. The most common tissue damaged by the tannins are the digestive tract and kidneys. Cattle and sheep appear to be more susceptible to toxicity than goats. Other animals such as horses, rabbits, and chickens have succumbed to the toxicity of oak poisoning as well. Interestingly, some individual animals are more tolerable of the toxins and show no ill effects when consuming acorns.
Clinical signs of oak toxicity usually appear a few days after consumption of acorns. Initially, the animals are weak, listless, emaciated, and anorexic. This is followed by ventral edema (swelling of lower parts of the body such as legs, chest, ventral abdomen), urinating large amounts of urine, abdominal pain, and constipation. The animal may pass hard mucus covered fecal material which may change to black tarry or bloody feces as the disease progresses. If the animal is not treated, kidney failure is likely.
A tentative diagnosis of acorn poisoning may be based on clinical signs and access to acorns. Blood tests that indicate kidney disease is another clue to the condition. A necroscopy with examination of tissues for characteristic lesions of the disease is the standard to confirm a diagnosis of oak toxicity.
Treatment of oak toxicity starts with removing the animals from the area where the acorns are located. Those animals displaying signs of the disease should be given fluids to correct dehydration and electrolyte imbalances. Mineral oil and/or activated charcoal may be given to reduce toxin absorption. If animals survive the initial toxicity, they may recover, but it may take several weeks for kidney function to return to normal.
As always, prevention is better than treatment. Producers should be very careful allowing livestock to graze in areas where acorns are present. Livestock should be fed plenty of hay and feed this fall to avoid over consumption of acorns. For those producers who cannot avoid grazing areas with large numbers of oak trees, feeding a grain mixture with 10% to 20% of calcium hydroxide has been successful in preventing problems with acorn poisoning.
Two thousand twenty-two has not been the best year for livestock producers. The drought has produced poor pasture conditions as well as very little hay. On top of those problems, feed costs continue to increase. The last problem a producer needs is a large number of sick cows. For those that graze an area with a large number of oak trees, prevention may be worth the cost this year. At the very least keep a close watch of your animals this fall. Producers wanting more information about oak toxicity, should consult with their local veterinarian or visit with their Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension County Agriculture Educator.
Farm & Ranch
Fescue Foot
Barry Whitworth, DVM | Area Food/Animal Quality and Health Specialist for Eastern Oklahoma
*Article originally printed in the October 2022 issue of Oklahoma Farm & Ranch.
Since most of Oklahoma experienced drought conditions and with fall fast approaching, producers with fescue pastures should closely observe their livestock for any signs of fescue toxicity. According to Mike Trammel, Pottawatomie County Ag Educator and Muti-County Agronomist, fescue toxins (ergot alkaloids) tend to increase in Kentucky-31 tall fescue pastures in the fall. Some reports indicate more problems with fescue toxins following a summer drought and limited fall rains. All of this may put Oklahoma cattle at a greater risk of fescue toxicity.
One issue that cattle experience with fescue toxins is fescue foot. Fescue foot is thought to be caused by ergot alkaloids such as ergovaline. These alkaloids are produced by endophyte fungus (Epichloë coenophiala) which is in tall fescue. Ergovaline has been proven to be a vasoconstrictor which might be responsible for fescue foot and heat intolerance also known as summer slump in cattle. Other issues that may be seen with the ergot fescue toxins are reduced milk production and reproductive issues.
Clinical signs of fescue foot appear within a few days of cattle being turned on to tall fescue pastures or it may take weeks if toxins in the pasture are low. Producers will initially observe cattle with arched back, rough hair coats, and sore feet. These symptoms are more noticeable early in the morning and with cold weather. This is followed by reddening and swelling in the area between the dewclaws and hooves. The lameness usually becomes more severe with time. If no action is taken, gangrene will result in loss of tissues distal to the coronary band and declaws. If the weather remains mild, other signs such as increase respiration rate, increase heart rate, and higher body temperature are more common.
Other causes of lameness in cattle must be differentiated from fescue foot. One simple method that will help differentiate fescue foot from footrot is to check the temperature of the foot. If the foot is cold, this is an indication that the problem is more likely fescue foot.
Since there is not a specific treatment for fescue foot, the condition must be managed. Cattle need to be observed daily for any signs of lameness or stiffness during the first few weeks on fescue pastures. This should be done early in the morning before cattle walk off the stiffness. Producers should pay close attention during cold weather, especially when rain, snow, or ice are present. Any animal showing clinical signs of fescue foot should be removed from the pasture and placed in a clean environment. The animal should be fed a ration with no fescue toxins.
The best but most costly solution to reduce fescue toxicity is to renovate old pastures with new endophyte friendly varieties. If this option is not possible, producers might try interseeding fescue pastures with clovers or other grasses. This should dilute fescue toxins. Nitrogen fertilization may increase ergot alkaloids, so producers should avoid fertilizing fescue pastures with high amounts of nitrogen. Researchers have demonstrated that feeding a supplement while grazing fescue pastures reduces clinical symptoms. Some studies indicate a difference in susceptibility to fescue toxicity in some cattle. Selecting cattle based on genetic tolerance of fescue toxins is an option. (For more information go to www.agbotanica.com/t-snip.aspx)
With large areas in Oklahoma covered with Kentucky-31 fescue pastures, fescue foot as well as other fescue toxicities are not going away any time soon. Livestock producers will need to watch their livestock closely for any signs of fescue toxicity and manage their pastures to keep toxins as low as possible. If producers would like more information on fescue foot, they should consult their veterinarian and/or visit their local Oklahoma State University Cooperative County Extension Agriculture Educator.
Farm & Ranch
External Parasites in Backyard Poultry
By Barry Whitworth, DVM, MPH | Senior Extension Specialist Department of Animal & Food Sciences | Ferguson College of Agriculture | Oklahoma State University
According to the 11th edition of Poultry Diseases, external parasites of poultry are arthropods that live on or in the skin and feathers. Essentially, parasites are freeloaders that live at the expense of the host. Backyard birds are infested with a variety of pests. Ticks, fleas, mites, and lice are some of the most common external parasites found in chickens, turkeys, and ducks. Several of these parasites are bloodsuckers. If not controlled, they can cause weight loss, decreased egg production, unthriftiness, and death in severe cases.
According to a study conducted by Dr. Amy Murillo and associates in California, the most common external parasites in backyard flocks were lice, fleas, and mites. Lice were the most frequently observed parasites, with the chicken body louse (Menacanthus stramineus) found on half of the premises inspected. The fluff louse (Goniocotes gallinae) was found in 35% of operations. The wing louse (Lipeurus caponis) and sticktight flea (Echidnophaga gallinacea) were present in 20% of flocks. Northern fowl mites (Ornithonyssus sylviarum), which are the most common mites found in commercial poultry operations, were detected in only 15% of flocks. However, the survey was conducted in the summer, which may have influenced the low number of northern fowl mites, since they are most active in the winter.
Birds infested with external parasites often become agitated due to skin irritation. They will spend more time preening and scratching. Their feathers may become damaged, and they may appear unhealthy. Birds showing these signs should be examined.
When examining birds for external parasites, producers should focus on the breast, back, head, vent region, and wings. Lice may be found on different parts of the body. They are yellowish in color and lie flat against the skin. Their eggs are typically found attached to the shafts of feathers. The vent area is the primary location to check for mite infestations and may appear “dirty.” Sticktight fleas are usually found embedded in the comb.
Birds should be monitored regularly. When producers are unable to examine all birds, they should focus on the young, the old, and any bird that appears unhealthy. The coop should also be inspected. Producers should examine the bedding, walls, and roosts, with close attention given to crevices and cracks where pests may hide.
Before parasite control can begin, the parasite must be correctly identified. Producers can use books or other publications for this purpose, or they may consult a veterinarian. Contacting the local Oklahoma State University Extension office is also a useful option. An agricultural extension educator may be able to identify the pest or submit samples to the Plant Disease and Insect Diagnostic Laboratory at Oklahoma State University for identification.
Prevention and control of external parasites require an integrated approach. The first line of defense is a strong biosecurity program to prevent parasites from entering the operation. Sanitation is also critical, keeping the coop and surrounding area clean helps prevent infestations.
Maintaining healthy birds is essential in preventing parasite infestations. Producers should focus on proper nutrition and disease prevention as they are key factors in maintaining a healthy flock. A strong immune system can help birds better withstand some external parasites.
Selecting the proper pesticide and using it correctly is essential. Many pests described in this article can be controlled with appropriate pesticides; however, their eggs are not killed, which requires repeated applications to target newly hatched larvae. Producers should read and follow pesticide label directions.
Alternative methods for external parasite control are also available such as providing diatomaceous earth mixed with sand for dust bathing or using sulfur bags to control mites and lice. For more information on these methods, see references below.
Finally, early identification and treatment greatly increase the chances of successful control. If infestations are allowed to become established, control becomes much more difficult.
For more information on external parasites in backyard poultry, producers may visit https://www.veterinaryentomology.org/ or contact their local veterinarian or Oklahoma State University County Agriculture Extension Educator.
References
Arends, J., J. (2003). External parasites and poultry pests. Diseases of Poultry. 11th Edition.
Murillo, A. C., & Mullens, B. A. (2016). Diversity and Prevalence of Ectoparasites on Backyard Chicken Flocks in California. Journal of medical entomology, 53(3), 707–71.
Murillo, A. C., & Mullens, B. A. (2016). Timing Diatomaceous Earth-Filled Dustbox Use for Management of Northern Fowl Mites (Acari: Macronyssidae) in Cage-Free Poultry Systems. Journal of economic entomology, 109(6), 2572–2579.
Murrillo, A.C., Mullens, B.A. (2016). Sulfur Dust Bag: A Novel Technique for Ectoparasite Control in Poultry Systems: Journal of Economic Entomology, 109(5), 2016, 2229-2233.
-
Country Lifestyle2 years agoJuly 2017 Profile: J.W. Hart
-
Attractions9 years ago48 Hours in Atoka Remembered
-
Farm & Ranch2 years agoFrom Plow to Plentiful: The Most Important Inventions in Agricultural History
-
Equine9 years agoUmbilical Hernia
-
Country Lifestyle5 years agoThe Two Sides of Colten Jesse
-
Outdoors8 years agoGrazing Oklahoma: Honey Locust
-
Farm & Ranch8 years agoHackberry (Celtis spp.)
-
Equine6 years agoOn the Road with Emily Miller-Beisel





