Farm & Ranch
A Steady Tradition
More than a century ago, a rugged, wild, and western stretch of land became, seemingly overnight, the site of Oklahoma’s first major industry.
Its legacy began shortly after statehood in 1907. Oklahoma City Chamber of Commerce members and fellow businessmen were searching for ways to bring more revenue to their city. They’d seen other major cities flourish with the presence of stockyards and envisioned the same for the fledgling state. With a prosperous future in mind, they decided to approach several of the major packing houses.
“The city fathers were looking at bringing in new industry, because everything was concentrated downtown. They secretly recruited packing houses in Chicago and Omaha because of the bustling business,” noted Kelli Payne, Oklahoma National Stockyards Yards Liaison and President of Stockyards City Mainstreet.
Chamber of Commerce President Sidney Brock sent letters to the largest packing houses, and soon Thomas Wilson, Executive Vice President of the Nelson Morris Company headquartered in Chicago, traveled south to see what Oklahoma City had to offer.
According to Payne, tall tales and stories surround the initial visit. “Obviously just getting someone here from Chicago would be a feat in the early 1900s. I can’t vouch for authenticity, but there’s a story that at the time there was only one available automobile in downtown Oklahoma City, and they borrowed it. As the crow flies, it’s only two miles from downtown to the Stockyards, but it took them two days to get there,” she explained. “There was no highway at the time. The Oklahoma River would have been raging, plus there was quicksand and plum thickets that they had to contend with.” One account notes that the passengers in the car spent a good bit of time pushing it out of ruts and mud.
While there might have been obstacles, the delegate from Chicago liked what they saw – but they still had big demands for the city. “These packinghouses knew what they could do. They knew how many cattle they could process in a day and how many employees they would hire, and they knew what an impact they would have on the city, so they had a long list of concessions,” Payne said. “The numbers were staggering. They needed 350,000 gallons of water a day for five years, because they would be using it constantly to clean and water cattle, and they needed it brought right to the gate. They also wanted a $300,000 bonus, a five-year tax exemption, sewer, electric, and street car lines, a railroad, and land adjacent to the North Canadian River.”
Oklahoma City councilmen met the demands of the Nelson Morris Company, and soon Schwarzchild and Sulzberger came to town under similar terms, and more followed. Morris connections constructed the necessary Oklahoma National Stockyards and established the Oklahoma Stockyards National Bank.
The Stockyards began operations in October of 1910 and represented the heaviest concentration of labor in the capitol city. The once desolate area boomed overnight, creating 2,400 new jobs in a city of 60,000. The area soon became known as Packingtown.
“A whole city sprang up. Hotels, a post office, banks, restaurants, grocery stores, hat makers, and anything you could imagine. A lot of guys that worked in the packing houses would work twelve hour shifts. Two would share a room, and when they’d leave for work, two different workers would come in and use their room.” Payne added, “It was a different lifestyle than what we enjoy today.”
Livestock began arriving by rail or cattle drive. At the time, the cattle were traded private treaty through the service of the many on-premise commission companies. Catwalks crisscrossed across the pens, and the sellers would make deals above. Soon the cattle would be loaded back on the trains and sent to the different packing houses; while some were close, some were a few miles away.
Big changes came in the early 1960s. Many other major stockyards had gone the route of live auctions, abandoning the practice of private treaty sales. “There’s another fable, and I’m sure there’s truth in there somewhere. There was a younger gentleman that was working in the stockyards. He went to the local clothing store and purchased a brand new set of overalls and a white button down shirt and hoped a train to Kansas City to see what the live auctions were all about,” Payne said.
That young man returned filled with excitement and convinced some other owners to try the live auction. Since they needed a place to hold the sales, the large barn that stored hay was renovated with an auction area and lobby and is still in use today.
Within a few months it was evident that the live auction method was there to stay. The auction provided competition for available livestock, and more growth followed. Today, the Stockyards handle cattle exclusively, but in its early years hogs, sheep, horses and mules also trotted across the bricks.
By 1966, the Oklahoma National Stockyards was one of the largest markets in the nation, representing approximately $125 million in annual business. In 1973, the number of saleable cattle rose to more than 900,000, and the Stockyards took the nation’s lead.
Unfortunately, the industry that created the need for the stockyards, the meat packing plants, were having a major business decline, and one-by-one, they closed or moved to other locations, resulting in a decline in receipts at stockyards across the country.
Payne added that, while the Oklahoma National Stockyards has had many years with nearly one million head of cattle passing through the arch, video sales and people contracting cattle directly to the feed yard have also contributed to the lower – but still strong numbers.
“There are other sale barns that, maybe over a year will move more cattle, but historically speaking, over the course of time we would be tough to beat,” Payne explained. “This past year we ran just under 400,000 head over cattle through the sale barn. Week in and week out we’re pretty strong.”
That strength is attributed to several factors, including the proximity to major interstates and highways, as well as feedlots in Texas and Kansas. “Our location is the best. There are cattle to the north, south, east and west, and we’re right in the middle,” Fisher said. “We also take care of our customers. We cater to the big companies as well as the small ranchers. It doesn’t matter if they bring 500 cattle or five, because we’ll take care of them.”
Fisher also noted that the schedule of selling cattle on Monday and Tuesday helps to draw in more sellers. “I think it helps because many of our customers have jobs, and they like that they can bring in cattle over the weekend,” he said.
The economic impact of the Stockyards can literally stretch across the country. “I’ve tried to pin it down. If you look at the impact here in Oklahoma City, you’re only looking at a small piece of the equation. It actually goes coast to coast,” Payne said. “For example, a couple times a year it gets really popular for Florida cattle to come to town, so if you look at it, they could be loaded in Florida and make the drive to Oklahoma City. They driver will have to buy fuel and food or maybe lodging, and they need the same once they get to Oklahoma City. Those cattle the driver brought could then be purchased and be in California within just a few days.”
While the Oklahoma National Stockyards employs between 20 to 30 people at a time, there are approximately 300 that make their living because of it. This includes employees of commission companies, and other companies located behind the arch.
Although droughts, floods, and other factors have caused fluctuations in the market, the Oklahoma National Stockyards has continued its steady tradition of the cattle business. “We were flooded with cows during the drought. We’re still trying to catch up on sleep because the cows just kept coming. Owners were out of hay, feed, and water, and they had no choice but to sell,” Payne recalled.
Learn more about the Oklahoma National Stockyards in the April issue of Oklahoma Farm & Ranch.
Farm & Ranch
Acorn Toxicity
Barry Whitworth, DVM
Area Food/Animal Quality and Health
Specialist for Eastern Oklahoma
With the prolonged drought, most pastures in Oklahoma are in poor condition. With the lack of available forage, animals may go in search of alternative foods. If oak trees are in the pastures, acorns may be a favorite meal for some livestock this fall. This may result in oak poisoning.
Oak (Quercus species) leaves, twigs, buds, and acorns may be toxic to some animals when consumed. Obviously, acorns can be a problem in the fall and green acorns can be more toxic than mature acorns. When acorns form only a small portion of the diet, there are usually no signs of problems. However, consumption of large quantities may result in toxicity. Tannins in the acorns cause the toxicity. The most common tissue damaged by the tannins are the digestive tract and kidneys. Cattle and sheep appear to be more susceptible to toxicity than goats. Other animals such as horses, rabbits, and chickens have succumbed to the toxicity of oak poisoning as well. Interestingly, some individual animals are more tolerable of the toxins and show no ill effects when consuming acorns.
Clinical signs of oak toxicity usually appear a few days after consumption of acorns. Initially, the animals are weak, listless, emaciated, and anorexic. This is followed by ventral edema (swelling of lower parts of the body such as legs, chest, ventral abdomen), urinating large amounts of urine, abdominal pain, and constipation. The animal may pass hard mucus covered fecal material which may change to black tarry or bloody feces as the disease progresses. If the animal is not treated, kidney failure is likely.
A tentative diagnosis of acorn poisoning may be based on clinical signs and access to acorns. Blood tests that indicate kidney disease is another clue to the condition. A necroscopy with examination of tissues for characteristic lesions of the disease is the standard to confirm a diagnosis of oak toxicity.
Treatment of oak toxicity starts with removing the animals from the area where the acorns are located. Those animals displaying signs of the disease should be given fluids to correct dehydration and electrolyte imbalances. Mineral oil and/or activated charcoal may be given to reduce toxin absorption. If animals survive the initial toxicity, they may recover, but it may take several weeks for kidney function to return to normal.
As always, prevention is better than treatment. Producers should be very careful allowing livestock to graze in areas where acorns are present. Livestock should be fed plenty of hay and feed this fall to avoid over consumption of acorns. For those producers who cannot avoid grazing areas with large numbers of oak trees, feeding a grain mixture with 10% to 20% of calcium hydroxide has been successful in preventing problems with acorn poisoning.
Two thousand twenty-two has not been the best year for livestock producers. The drought has produced poor pasture conditions as well as very little hay. On top of those problems, feed costs continue to increase. The last problem a producer needs is a large number of sick cows. For those that graze an area with a large number of oak trees, prevention may be worth the cost this year. At the very least keep a close watch of your animals this fall. Producers wanting more information about oak toxicity, should consult with their local veterinarian or visit with their Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension County Agriculture Educator.
Farm & Ranch
Fescue Foot
Barry Whitworth, DVM | Area Food/Animal Quality and Health Specialist for Eastern Oklahoma
*Article originally printed in the October 2022 issue of Oklahoma Farm & Ranch.
Since most of Oklahoma experienced drought conditions and with fall fast approaching, producers with fescue pastures should closely observe their livestock for any signs of fescue toxicity. According to Mike Trammel, Pottawatomie County Ag Educator and Muti-County Agronomist, fescue toxins (ergot alkaloids) tend to increase in Kentucky-31 tall fescue pastures in the fall. Some reports indicate more problems with fescue toxins following a summer drought and limited fall rains. All of this may put Oklahoma cattle at a greater risk of fescue toxicity.
One issue that cattle experience with fescue toxins is fescue foot. Fescue foot is thought to be caused by ergot alkaloids such as ergovaline. These alkaloids are produced by endophyte fungus (Epichloë coenophiala) which is in tall fescue. Ergovaline has been proven to be a vasoconstrictor which might be responsible for fescue foot and heat intolerance also known as summer slump in cattle. Other issues that may be seen with the ergot fescue toxins are reduced milk production and reproductive issues.
Clinical signs of fescue foot appear within a few days of cattle being turned on to tall fescue pastures or it may take weeks if toxins in the pasture are low. Producers will initially observe cattle with arched back, rough hair coats, and sore feet. These symptoms are more noticeable early in the morning and with cold weather. This is followed by reddening and swelling in the area between the dewclaws and hooves. The lameness usually becomes more severe with time. If no action is taken, gangrene will result in loss of tissues distal to the coronary band and declaws. If the weather remains mild, other signs such as increase respiration rate, increase heart rate, and higher body temperature are more common.
Other causes of lameness in cattle must be differentiated from fescue foot. One simple method that will help differentiate fescue foot from footrot is to check the temperature of the foot. If the foot is cold, this is an indication that the problem is more likely fescue foot.
Since there is not a specific treatment for fescue foot, the condition must be managed. Cattle need to be observed daily for any signs of lameness or stiffness during the first few weeks on fescue pastures. This should be done early in the morning before cattle walk off the stiffness. Producers should pay close attention during cold weather, especially when rain, snow, or ice are present. Any animal showing clinical signs of fescue foot should be removed from the pasture and placed in a clean environment. The animal should be fed a ration with no fescue toxins.
The best but most costly solution to reduce fescue toxicity is to renovate old pastures with new endophyte friendly varieties. If this option is not possible, producers might try interseeding fescue pastures with clovers or other grasses. This should dilute fescue toxins. Nitrogen fertilization may increase ergot alkaloids, so producers should avoid fertilizing fescue pastures with high amounts of nitrogen. Researchers have demonstrated that feeding a supplement while grazing fescue pastures reduces clinical symptoms. Some studies indicate a difference in susceptibility to fescue toxicity in some cattle. Selecting cattle based on genetic tolerance of fescue toxins is an option. (For more information go to www.agbotanica.com/t-snip.aspx)
With large areas in Oklahoma covered with Kentucky-31 fescue pastures, fescue foot as well as other fescue toxicities are not going away any time soon. Livestock producers will need to watch their livestock closely for any signs of fescue toxicity and manage their pastures to keep toxins as low as possible. If producers would like more information on fescue foot, they should consult their veterinarian and/or visit their local Oklahoma State University Cooperative County Extension Agriculture Educator.
Farm & Ranch
The Value of Vitamin A
Barry Whitworth, DVM – Area Food/Animal Quality and Health – Specialist for Eastern Oklahoma
A ranch in Australia experienced an abnormally high number of stillbirths and weak born calves in 2004-2005. An investigation revealed that the usual infectious causes were not the problem. After additional testing, veterinarians diagnosed low levels of vitamin A as the cause.
According to Dr. Greg Hanzlicek, with the Kansas State Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (KSVDL), Kansas had an unusually high number of stillbirth cases and weak born calves in the spring of 2019. After many laboratory tests, it was concluded that the problem stimmed from a lack of energy, protein, Vitamin A, or combinations of all of these.
Both of the above examples demonstrate the importance of vitamin A in reproductive efficiency. Research has shown that low vitamin A levels during pregnancy are associated with abortions, stillbirths, and weak born calves. In addition to playing an important role in reproductive efficiency, vitamin A is essential for vision, bone growth, and maintaining epithelial tissue such as skin and hooves.
Animals obtain vitamin A from consuming green forage and/or the addition of vitamin A supplements to the diet. Lush green pastures contain high amounts of vitamin A. As plants mature and during times of drought, the amount of vitamin A decreases. The ranch in Australia experienced below average rainfall in the previous two years prior to the calving season. During the calving season, rainfall was below average with very dry conditions and little green forage was available.
In general, animals obtain adequate amounts of vitamin A by grazing green forage. Animals grazing green pastures will build a healthy store of vitamin A in the liver. When vitamin A is in short supply, the stores in the liver prevent deficiencies. According to Dr. Lalman, Extension Beef Cattle Specialist Oklahoma State University, the stores should last 2 to 4 months during times of deficiency. During times when green forage is not available, vitamin A supplements need to be added to the diet to prevent deficiencies.
When vitamin A levels are deficient, night blindness is one of the earliest clinical signs. Other eye issues include clouding of the cornea, ocular discharges, and possible ulcerations. Skin issues found when levels of vitamin A are deficient include a dry rough coat, scales on the skin, and dry cracked hooves. Other neurological signs include incoordination or gait problems. Seizures may occur due to the increase cerebrospinal fluid pressure. Birth defects have also been attributed to low vitamin A levels.
Animals displaying vitamin A deficiency should be treated immediately with vitamin A injections. If treated early, response is usually rapid and complete. However, delaying treatment may result in irreversible damage. Even with treatment, cattle with vision impairment due to vitamin A deficiency may not regain their sight.
Preventing Vitamin A deficiency depends on producers being attentive to the environmental conditions that favor low vitamin A levels in forage. During these times, producers need to supplement the diet with vitamin A. Producers need to be aware that Vitamin A supplements degrade rapidly, so vitamin A supplements should not be stored for long periods of time. In addition to vitamin A supplementation, research indicates that diets low in protein result in poor absorption of vitamin A. It is important that producers ensure that the rations have sufficient protein levels. Lastly, since colostrum contains high levels of vitamin A, producers need to ensure that newborns obtain adequate amounts of colostrum at birth.
Similar to the Australian example, most of Oklahoma had below average rainfall for the year of 2022. This resulted in pasture quality decreasing earlier than normal. Due to this year’s lack of green forage, liver stores of vitamin A may be inadequate for the animal’s needs. Producers need to ensure that the diets of their cattle have adequate amounts of vitamin A, energy, and protein. For more information about Vitamin A, producers should contact their veterinarian and/or visit with their Oklahoma State University County Ag Educator.
References
Hanzlicek, G. (2019, May). Difficult Calving Season Findings:2019. Diagnostic Insights. www.ksudl.org/resources/news/diagnostic_insights/may2019/difficult-calving-season2019.html.
Hill, B., Holroyd, R., & Sullivan, M. (2009). Clinical and pathological findings associated with congenital hypovitaminosis A in extensively grazed beef cattle. Australian Veterinary Journal, 87(3), 94–98.
Parker, E. M., Gardiner, C. P., Kessell, A. E., & Parker, A. J. (2017). Hypovitaminosis A in extensively grazed beef cattle. Australian veterinary journal, 95(3), 80–84.
-
Country Lifestyle2 years agoJuly 2017 Profile: J.W. Hart
-
Attractions9 years ago48 Hours in Atoka Remembered
-
Equine9 years agoUmbilical Hernia
-
Outdoors8 years agoGrazing Oklahoma: Honey Locust
-
Country Lifestyle4 years agoThe Two Sides of Colten Jesse
-
Farm & Ranch1 year agoFrom Plow to Plentiful: The Most Important Inventions in Agricultural History
-
Farm & Ranch8 years agoHackberry (Celtis spp.)
-
Equine6 years agoOn the Road with Emily Miller-Beisel





