Farm & Ranch
Beef Quality Assurance: A Commitment to Cattle, Consumers, and the Future
Barry Whitworth, DVM, MPH
Senior Extension Specialist/State BQA Coordinator
Department of Animal & Food Sciences | Ferguson College of Agriculture | Oklahoma State University
According to one survey, Beef Quality Assurance (BQA) is the most successful rancher educational program in the United States. In Oklahoma, BQA is a joint effort of the Oklahoma Beef Council, Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension Service, and the OSU Department of Animal and Food Sciences. This Beef Checkoff-funded program helps cattle producers raise healthy cattle while providing consumers with a healthy, safe, wholesome product.
BQA is a voluntary certification program that provides cattle producers with science-based guidelines for animal husbandry, herd health, and food safety. Launched in the 1980s, BQA helps producers adopt best management practices that reduce residues, prevent defects in carcasses, and improve the overall quality of beef. This not only benefits producers but also builds consumer confidence.
The objectives of BQA are to provide hands on training to help cattle producers meet BQA expectations as well as realize the benefits of being BQA certified. BQA emphasizes record keeping that meets or exceeds government guidelines. BQA participants are provided with technical assistance from BQA staff, veterinarians, extension specialists, and others. Lastly, BQA provides a foundation for responsible cattle management.
To improve beef quality, BQA applies principles from the Hazard Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP)program. This system helps producers identify key control points in beef production where management practices can prevent problems before they occur. Preventing issues at the source not only protects consumers but also makes economic sense for producers.
The BQA program addresses a wide range of management practices such as cattle care, herd health, biosecurity, nutrition, record keeping, transportation, environmental stewardship, worker safety, and emergency action planning. Emphasizing these results in better outcomes for cattle as well as producers. To find other areas where improvement should be made, BQA relies on the National Beef Quality Audits (NBQA). These audits are conducted roughly every five years on feeder steers and heifers and cull cows and bulls. The audits can be viewed at www.bqa.org.
Beef cattle producers have different options for certification. The option of certification depends on what phase of the beef cattle production cycle producers identify with. One certification program is related to cow/calf production for those who breed and sell calves. Another program deals with stocker/backgrounder operations for those that raise and sell feeder cattle, and lastly, feeder operators can be feedyard certified. Even those individuals that haul cattle can be BQA certified in transportation.
BQA trainings can be done online at bqa.org or in-person trainings occur across the state of Oklahoma throughout the year. For in-person training, producers should contact their local Oklahoma State University Cooperative Extension County office for more information.
BQA certifications are valid for three years from the date of the original certification. To renew a certification, a producer must obtain three hours of continuing educational (CE) courses before their BQA certification expires. CE courses are available at bqa.org or can be obtained through OSU Extension programs.
BQA certification demonstrates to consumers that beef cattle are raised with care, respect, and responsibility. By following BQA guidelines, producers can improve herd health, reduce losses, and increase consumer demand for beef. In short, BQA is both good business and the right thing to do.
For more information about BQA, cattle producers should visit the BQA website at www.bqa.org or contact their local Oklahoma State University Cooperative County Extension office.
References
Klopatek, S. C., Cantwell, A. M., Roche, L., Stackhouse-Lawson, K., & Oltjen, J. W. (2022). Beef Quality Assurance national rancher survey: program participation, best management practices, and motivations for joining future sustainability programs. Translational animal science, 6(3), txac094.
Farm & Ranch
The Life Cycle of a Show Steer: An Introduction
For many livestock exhibitors in Oklahoma, the Oklahoma Youth Expo is always top of mind. As the highly anticipated event approaches, I couldn’t think of a better time to introduce my new seven-part series, The Life Cycle of a Show Steer.
Growing up in the livestock industry—raising, selling, and exhibiting market steers—I’ve been immersed in this world for as long as I can remember. As a kid, I hosted “steer shows” in my living room, dragging a stuffed calf around while begging my mom to judge (not to brag, but I won every time). Recognizing my passion early on, my dad handed me a real show halter at just three years old. Since then, I’ve had the privilege of competing at shows across the country, from the Sioux Empire Livestock Show to the National Western Stock Show and Rodeo.
While winning at national events was unforgettable—especially covering my steer in glitter for the Sioux Empire Sale of Champions and standing on the green carpet in Denver—nothing compares to the limo ride tradition at the Oklahoma Youth Expo. In 2022, my steer, Tarzan, was named breed champion All Other Breeds (AOB), but the journey to that moment was long and full of hard work.
Throughout this series, I’ll take you behind the scenes of what it takes to prepare a steer for his final show, using Tarzan’s story as a guide. From selecting genetics to the emotional final days at the show, I’ll cover every stage of the process.
Farm & Ranch
Why Body Condition is Important in the Cow Herd
By Marty New
Body condition scores of beef cows at the time of calving have the greatest impact on subsequent rebreeding performance.
One of the major constraints in the improvement of reproductive efficiency is the duration of the post-calving anestrous period. If cows are to maintain a calving interval of one year, they must conceive within 80 days to 85 days after calving. Calving intervals in excess of 12 months are often caused by nutritional stress at some point, which results in thin body condition and poor reproductive performance.
Research has shown mature and young cows that maintain body weight have ample energy reserves before parturition, exhibited estrus sooner than cows that lost considerable body weight and consequently had poor energy reserves. Body weight change during pregnancy is confounded with embryo and placenta growth. Therefore, the estimation of body fat by use of body condition scores is more useful in quantifying the energy status of beef cows. The system of body condition scoring is an excellent estimator of percentage of body fat in beef cows.
The processes of fetal development, delivering a calf, milk production and repair of the reproductive tract are all physiological stresses. These stresses require availability and utilization of large quantities of energy to enable cows to be rebred in the required 85 days.
Added to physiological stresses are the environmental stresses of cold, wet weather on spring calving cows. In normal cow diets, energy intake will be below the amount needed to maintain body weight and condition. As the intake falls short of the energy utilized, the cow compensates by mobilizing stored energy and over a period of several weeks, a noticeable change in the outward appearance of the cow takes place.
Cows that have a thin body condition at calving return to estrus slowly. Postpartum increases in energy intake can modify the length of the postpartum interval. However, increases in the quality and quantity of feed to increase postpartum body condition can be very expensive. Improvement in reproductive performance achieved by expensive postpartum feeding to thin cows may not be adequate to justify the cost of the additional nutrients.
The influence of nutrition before calving is a major factor that controls the length of time between calving and the return to estrus. Thin cows with a BCS score of four or less at calving produce less colostrum as well as give birth to less vigorous calves that are slower to stand.
The impact of quality and quantity of colostrum will effect these calves’ immunoglobulin levels, thus harming their ability to overcome early calf-hood disease challenges. It is much easier to increase condition in cows before rather than after they calve. High nutrition after calving is directed first toward milk production. Feeding cows to gain condition early in lactation therefore leads to increased milk production but has little effect on body condition.
Cows prior to calving and through breeding should have a BCS of five or higher to have good reproductive performance. First-calf heifers should have a BCS of six. Spring-calving cows are still consuming harvested forages and lactating will generally lose one BCS following calving.
Over-stocking pastures is a common cause of poor body condition and reproductive failure. Proper stocking, year-round mineral supplementation and timely use of protein supplement offer potential for economically improving body condition score and reproductive performance.
An efficient way to utilize BCS involves sorting cows by condition 90 to 100 days prior to calving. Feed each group to have condition scores of five to six at calving. These would be logical scores for achieving maximum reproductive performance while holding supplemental feed costs to a minimum.
Body condition scoring has allowed cattlemen to continually evaluate their nutritional program. By evaluating cow condition at strategic times of the year, it is possible to coordinate use of the forage resource with nutritional needs of the cow herd so supplemental feed and hay needs are reduced to a minimum.
This article originally appeared in the February 2016 issue of Oklahoma Farm & Ranch.
Farm & Ranch
Disaster Prep
By Barry Whitworth, DVM
Chances are that livestock producers at some time or another will be affected by a disaster such as a flood, tornado, drought or wildfire. Whatever the disaster, the challenge of any producer is to take care of their animals. Unlike small animals, farm animals tend to be large and require special needs in an emergency. For this reason, it is important to take the time to prepare a “Disaster Preparedness Plan.”
The plan will hopefully create a step-by-step set of guidelines to follow during a chaotic situation that will keep both animals and humans safe. In any disaster situation, the most important thing for a producer is to ensure above all else that his/her family and life come first. A producer should never attempt to risk his/her life or a member of their family’s life to save the life of an animal.
The start of a good disaster preparedness plan begins with evaluating what are the most likely disasters that a ranch or farm might face. For example, a ranch in the far eastern part of the state may not spend as much time with drought preparation as a ranch in the western part of the state. All producers should take the time to research history and look at weather patterns to understand the most likely disasters they could face.
Next, the producer should evaluate their premises to determine the potential risk to the animals. For example, the producer may want to remove the animals from any area that falls in a flood plain during certain times of the year or have an evacuation plan ready in case of an emergency. One should also evaluate the structures on the property. Are the barns or sheds able to withstand strong winds or not? The answer to that question will determine if the animals will be kept in a barn or turned out in a pasture during a storm.
Stacks of lumber and/or tin should be tied down. This will prevent the material from being blown around and possibly injuring an animal. Areas around a barn should be kept mowed and free of dead debris. This will help reduce risk where there is potential for a wildfire.
These questions and more need to be addressed in preparing the plan.
A disaster preparedness plan should also include animal identification. All animals need some form of identification. Brands, microchips and tattoos make excellent identifications since they are more permanent than other forms. Pictures will help identify animals. The producer should have records of ownership in case animals are lost or die in the disaster. This will be important if the producer is receiving insurance or indemnity payments.
It is important to remember that during a disaster power and utilities may be lost. A livestock owner who relies on electricity for his/her animals will need to have a backup source of power. A seven to 10-day supply of feed and water should be kept on hand. Producers may want to prepare an emergency kit. Items that might be included in the kit are halters, ropes, feed buckets, medications, first aid supplies, cleaning supplies, flashlights, batteries, cell phone, radio, feed, hay, water and generator. These are just a few things that a producer might need in an emergency.
An evacuation may need to be part of a producer’s disaster preparedness plan. Moving large herds of animals is probably not feasible. However, producers may wish to evacuate a small number of animals that have exceptional genetics. If evacuation is an option, producers will need to prearrange for an evacuation site. They will need to establish a route.
The truck should be full of gas and the trailer hitched during unfavorable conditions. Producers need to leave early. A producer should keep in mind that traffic may be increased during a disaster. The last thing a livestock owner needs is to be caught in a disaster stuck on a highway.
The producers will need to take feed and hay or prearrange for delivery to the evacuation site. If the animals are to remain on the farm, the producer will need to establish an area that he/she feels is safest depending on what the disaster is. For example, a pasture with no trees would be safer than a pasture with a few trees that animals would congregate under during a severe storm.
Once the crisis is over, the owner should be prepared to deal with injuries and dead animals. Producers need to have a carcass disposal plan ready in advance. Producers need to check with the local and state officials about the laws for disposing of animals. Producers need to realize that there is a chance that some animals will need to be euthanized. Owners need to be prepared to euthanize or contact a veterinarian to this job.
Planning how to deal with a disaster is like writing a will. Most of us think that we have plenty of time to get it done later. Unfortunately, later usually comes earlier than we like, and we get caught in an emergency with no plan. If a producer would like more information about planning for a disaster, they should go to www.prep4agthreats or contact their local county educator.
This article originally appeared in the June 2018 issue of Oklahoma Farm & Ranch.
-
Attractions8 years ago48 Hours in Atoka Remembered
-
Country Lifestyle1 year agoJuly 2017 Profile: J.W. Hart
-
Equine8 years agoUmbilical Hernia
-
Country Lifestyle4 years agoThe Two Sides of Colten Jesse
-
Country Lifestyle9 years agoThe House a Treasure Built
-
Outdoors8 years agoGrazing Oklahoma: Honey Locust
-
Farm & Ranch7 years agoHackberry (Celtis spp.)
-
Outdoors5 years agoPecan Production Information: Online Resources for Growers




